Measuring 2.0: Bringin-People-together´ness (part 3 of 5)

Today I would like to continue my series about measuring 2.0’ness with a handful (part 3 of 5) of things to check. First things first: The idea to measure 2.0’ness is simply to identify easily those factors which make a 2.0-service or -application really „fly“ i.e. successful. There are certain things that many of the applications and services which are successful have in common.

Bringin-People-together´ness
The Bringin-People-together´ness is one of the five significant criterias to unleash the power of 2.0. The internet does not grow on its own, people make it grow like a building. It’s the people who connect and make the connections.

In part 1 (Longtail/Crowd Sourcing) and part 2 (Future/Trends/Innovation) I tried to explain my point of view about which are the first and the second most driving forces behind 2.0’ness. Part 3 (Connecting People) sheds some light upon the network and the social side of the net.

People – wherever they are – do not like to be alone. The human beeing is a social beeing which usually cannot live without any connection to others for endless periods of time. We like to connect and to contact. But if you should choose from 6 Billion people on the net with whom to connect, this results in a problem. You need to make a descision for a certain selection. You need something that helps you connect to the right people. Often the best connection is made meeting people which are „like-minded“ or which do have the „same interests“, at least they have something in common.

Bringing people together which are like-minded to inspire each other seems like a very promising approach then. And it is! Nearly all socalled social webapplications like e.g. facbook, xing, studivz, orkut, lastfm, flickr, myspace, and so on allow you to declare yourself as beeing interested in certain things by e.g. simply adding yourself to a group. It is easy as that! Just by „broadcasting“ your favourite subjects you get connections from others out there.

If you want to bring people together, you need to give them tools to express their profile of interest. This may be e.g.:

  • a homepage,
  • some list of favourite things,
  • groups to select
  • tags to be shared
  • comments to be shared
  • votings to be made
  • an other stuff.

As soon as people check out that exposing some of their interests rewards people with beeing connected to like-minded ones, this will establish lasting connections. It actually builds the web and creates a stable structure. If you think in terms of „visitor“ or „customer“ this may lead to returning „visitors“ and „customers“ because they are bound by a stable structure. They are in a way catched and connected to a structure and they are happy finding like minded people in this structure.

Why do i blog this? It’s the next step in completing my series of 2.0’ness-factors and there are still two factors left. Be surprised by the next two and how you can combine them to make up a powerful instrument to evaluate 2.0’ness. If you have the time I would encourage you to just try to check you favourite services in respect to, what they offer to bring people together. Leave a comment to tell me what you discovered.

Unternehmen am Pranger 2.0?

kununu_logo.jpgEs gibt Spickmich.de, um die Lehrer der Schule zu bewerten, es gibt Qype.de, um Restaurants, Zahnärzte, Wellness-Oasen und vieles andere zu bewerten, es gibt Moviepilot.de, um Kinofilme zu bewerten, es gibt MeinProf.de um den Professor aus der Vorlesung zu bewerten, es gibt Rottenneighbour.com, um die Nachbarschaft im Stadtteil zu „bewerten“.
kununu_top_enterprises.png Seit Kurzem gibt es auch kununu.com, um Unternehmen als Arbeitgeber zu bewerten. Vielleicht ist Pranger übertrieben, aber auch die TOP-Unternehmen werden eben ans Licht der Öffentlichkeit gezerrt. Ob ein solches Unternehmen dann weiter TOP bleiben kann, wenn plötzlich jeder dort hin möchte, weil es ja so gut ist? Oder ist es vielleicht auch besser ein nicht so „toppes“ Unternehmen zu wählen, um es TOP zu machen? Egal, hierfür hat kununu den Beraich speziell für Arbeitgeber geschaffen, in dem man sogenanntes Employer Branding betreiben kann (Videos schalten, Jobanzeigen und weitere Werbung) eine gute Geschäftsidee. (Gefunden über Google, weiteres soeben gefunden bei fischmarkt.de) Hier noch ein Kurzinterview mit einem der Gründer.

Why do I blog this? Nun zumindest bei rottenneighbor.com kommt man nicht umhin an „Blogwart 2.0“ zu denken. Ein konstruktiver Lösungsansatz sieht sicher anders aus, als einen Nachbarn anzuschwärzen. Aber wie ist es mit den anderen Diensten? Welchen Einfluss werden sie gewinnen? Was bedeutet es, wenn das Internet immer mehr frei zugängliche unverifizierte „Aussagen über andere“ liefert? Bewegen wir uns gar auf das Peak Web zu? Macht man sich überhaupt noch ein eigenes Bild oder besteht das gemachte Bild nur noch aus dem was Suchmaschinen bzw. Algorithmen uns liefern…? Halt, die Suchmaschine liefert vielleicht, aber eingestellt hat die Information zumindest ein Mensch und programmiert hat die Machine die sie findet und verteilt auch ein Mensch! Mensch verändert Mensch = Kulturwandel?

Measuring 2.0: Future-Arrived´ness (part 2 of 5)

Having introduced the first criteria of 4+1 to measure 2.0 I would like to continue this series today with the second part. The essence of the second criteria is the following:

Future-Arrived´ness
The Future-Arrived´ness describes extreme differences in the structures of distribution of the future. It describes the fact that the future is often already out there but not yet distributed evenly (only some Geeks know it = small peak somewhere)

What does this mean? If we want to evaluate the freshness of a new application popping up on the horizon, we need to ask ourselves, how much people already know about this thing? Especially who knows about this new thing? If our answer is something like: „Wow!“, it seems as if nobody else then me knows about this, whoever I ask, than the knowledge about this new application is not yet widespread available – a sure sign that you belong to the ones who’ve seen it first. You gained a glimpse on the future and this future is far from having arrived everywhere.

Future-arrived’ness is a strong sign for a possible 2.0 impact. Often these unknown applications are just the rising stars of tomorrow and the less people had the chance to evaluate the idea of this new app, the higher the chance that this application will have an impact on the web-culture.

This idea of future-arrived’ness is not very new though. Other industries like e.g. Music- & Fashion-Business have their well known Trendscouts which are just on the road out there to get a glimpse on the next hot beats and dance moves or the latest fresh and unknown fashion style. To evaluate some new application or service we need some trendscout-abilities. At least we need to know some people which we could ask if they know about this new webservice or application we’ve just discovered five minutes ago. The less of your peers know anything about it, the higher the probability of some direct hit for a candidate who has not yet arrived in the future.

Why do I blog this? I just want to continue my series and then I had one day off from work which gave me some time to write this new entry. And it made a lot of fun to me. The criteria takes btw a huge share of a quote which is attributed to William Gibson and which i found to be in the original :“The future is already here – it is just unevenly distributed.“ Perhaps e.g. teensintech.com will become such a new Trendscout who knows…