{"id":25,"date":"2006-05-22T22:11:00","date_gmt":"2006-05-22T21:11:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thetawelle.de\/?p=25"},"modified":"2009-01-07T22:43:31","modified_gmt":"2009-01-07T21:43:31","slug":"edith-ackermann-on-piaget-papert-and-vygotsky","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.thetawelle.de\/?p=25","title":{"rendered":"Edith Ackermann on Piaget, Papert and Vygotsky"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"\/wp-upload\/edith.JPG\" alt=\"Edith\" align=\"right\" width=\"125\" height=\"150\" hspace=\"10\" vspace=\"5\" \/>Today (thanks to <a href=\"http:\/\/dimeb.informatik.uni-bremen.de\/schelhowe\/\">Heidi Schelhowe<\/a> at <a href=\"http:\/\/dimeb.informatik.uni-bremen.de\">DIMEB<\/a>) we had the chance to get into some details about the great three researchers &#8211; and their contribution to constructivism and constructionism &#8211; with <a href=\"http:\/\/dcg.mit.edu\/\">Edith Ackermann<\/a> (see image to the right), a Professor of Developmental Psychology (currently <a href=\"http:\/\/learning.media.mit.edu\/mid_people.php\">Visiting Professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology &#8211; MIT<\/a>). She presented her ideas about the three theoretical ideas of Piaget, Papert and Vygotsky and compared them by usig the metaphor of a caricature of &#8222;The Piaget-Child&#8220;, the &#8222;The Papert-Child&#8220; and the &#8222;The Vygotsky-Child&#8220;.<\/p>\n<p>The one lasting impression I got visiting the event was that <strong>imagination is a key element in all learning<\/strong>. So improving our capabilities on imagination cannot be wrong if we want to learn more, find out new things and innovate. This seems to be trivial news, but if you are honest, when did you imagine the last time how thing could be different? I especially was delighted, that she mentioned the special way, japanese culture has a metaphor for imagination. They call it &#8222;<strong>kobito<\/strong>&#8220; or &#8222;<strong>little people<\/strong>&#8220; which means, that whenever you imagine something, you &#8222;send out&#8220; one or more representations of yourself (little persons) and try to get a different perspective on things. I really like this metaphor because this is actually a very successful way to get different perspectives on things, which is e.g. important in software engineering if you need to imagine many things on different levels of abstraction at the same time.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"\/wp-upload\/logo_e.GIF\" alt=\"\" width=\"150\" height=\"55\" hspace=\"10\" vspace=\"5\" align=\"left\"\/>Edith is interested in the intersections between learning, teaching, design, and digital technologies. So it comes to no surprise, she has left some traces on the internet. E.g. at <a href=\"http:\/\/www.childresearch.net\/index.html\"><strong>childresearch.net<\/strong><\/a> which hosted a project called <strong>Playshop<\/strong>. Child Research Net held this Playshop (actually a workshop) on November 28, 1999 called &#8222;Playshop 1999&#8220; at Benesse Corporation in Tama City, <strong>Tokyo, Japan<\/strong>. More than 150 people, consisting of children, parents and educators, moved their whole bodies and used their imagination to engage in various activities. You can find <a href=\"http:\/\/www.childresearch.net\/PROJECT\/PLAYSHOP\/PLAYSHOP2000\/1999\/index.html\">transcripts of the workshop here<\/a>. Find an even more interesting list of research papers about children and learning at the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.childresearch.net\/RESOURCE\/RESEARCH\/index.html\">child-research-net-site<\/a>, e.g. her <a href=\"http:\/\/www.childresearch.net\/RESOURCE\/RESEARCH\/2005\/ACKERMANN.HTM\">latest paper there<\/a> has the title &#8218;<strong>Playthings That Do Things: A Young Kid&#8217;s &#8222;Incredibles&#8220;!<\/strong>&#8218; and it is <a href=\"http:\/\/www.childresearch.net\/RESOURCE\/RESEARCH\/2005\/playthings.pdf\"><strong>downloadable as PDF<\/strong><\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Add-on: I did some more research on the <strong>kobito<\/strong>-topic and found a really remarkable explanation from <a href=\"http:\/\/www.adm.u-tokyo.ac.jp\/IRS\/IntroPage_E\/intro68350475_e.html\">Yutaka Sayeki<\/a> (Sayeki-sensei) which I found as a <a href=\"http:\/\/lchc.ucsd.edu\/MCA\/Mail\/xmcamail.1995_09.dir\/0101.html\">transcript<\/a> of an E-Mail-Answer on the Internet which describes this method as <strong>kobito-dispatching<\/strong>:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\nDate: Fri, 22 Sep 95 10:33:10 JST<br \/>\nFrom: Ysayeki <ysayeki who-is-at tansei.cc.u-tokyo.ac.jp\nSubject: correction\n\nThe basic ideas in Sayeki's anthropomorphic epistemology is to dispatch 'kobitos' (viewpoints, or rather sense-points) to the object (thing or person), then to integrate them through inner conversations among 'kobitos' to make a unified sense. However, this kind of inner activity does not easily happen, unless the person has the prolepsis that the activity sphere with object or person would make some unknown benefit for the development of his\/her indentity in the sphere. \n\nThis kind of prolepsis, \"Something good must happen to me (and others, too),  if I have 'got into' the activity sphere (yet-to-be-recognized as a 'community'),\" should be initiated by the encounter and interaction with a particular person, to be called *YOU* (e.g., Mother to a baby), who is trustworthy and proleptic to the development of the person's self. (It is often the case that *YOU* initiate the dispatch of kobitos to the person, which later becomes reciprocal.) Only when the person encounter with *YOU*, he\/she start dispatch kobitos to the variety objects\/persons in the proleptic activity sphere around *YOU*. THE WAY TO DISPATCH KOBITOS WOULD BE JOINTLY LEARNED WITH THE *YOU*,  TO BE A PART OF CULTURAL PRACTICE .\n\nThe person gradually see and engage in the other persons\/objects in the sphere behind *YOU*, thus the sphere will be extnded to be a community i.e., *THEY*-world. Person is led to participate in the community of practice through this encounter with *YOU*, thus the participation (formation of the identity) in LPP is socially and mutually constructed through the kobito-dispatching to the objects and persons in the proleptic sphere.\n\nYutaka Sayeki\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Also interesting perhaps: Link to <a href=\"http:\/\/www.jset.gr.jp\/index.html\">Japan Society for Educational Technology<\/a>, Linkt to a book called <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/uk\/catalogue\/catalogue.asp?isbn=0521558239\">Mind, Culture, and Activity<\/a>.<\/ysayeki><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><strong>Update 7.1.2009<\/strong><br \/>\nEin interessanter Foliensatz von Yutaka Saeki zum Thema <a href=\"http:\/\/ocw.u-tokyo.ac.jp\/wp-content\/uploads\/lecture-notes_eng\/GF_04\/E_GFK2006wb-03.pdf\">&#8222;Wisdom and Human Beeings&#8220;<\/a> ist im Internet abrufbar. Dort stellt er auch ausf\u00fchrlicher die Methode des &#8222;Kobito Dispatching&#8220; vor.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Today (thanks to Heidi Schelhowe at DIMEB) we had the chance to get into some details about the great three researchers &#8211; and their contribution to constructivism and constructionism &#8211; with Edith Ackermann (see image to the right), a Professor of Developmental Psychology (currently Visiting Professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology &#8211; MIT). She &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thetawelle.de\/?p=25\" class=\"more-link\"><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">\u201eEdith Ackermann on Piaget, Papert and Vygotsky\u201c <\/span>weiterlesen<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[31,22,2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-25","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-imagination","category-japan","category-gefunden"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetawelle.de\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetawelle.de\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetawelle.de\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetawelle.de\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetawelle.de\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=25"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetawelle.de\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetawelle.de\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=25"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetawelle.de\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=25"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetawelle.de\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=25"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}